Rinsers: My new catch 22 of TV

After Channel 4 airing new documentary, “Sex, Lies & Rinsing Guys”, rumours are that there is now going to be a whole reality series devoted to the subject of the ladies’ “rinser” lifestyles.

I watched the programme last week on Catch Up, and I have to say, I still don’t really know where I stand on the whole thing. 

On the one hand, these girls ARE showing some sense of initiative (I suppose) and some how making their own way. But then again, its all paid for ultimately, somewhere down the line, by these poor sods who would seemingly rather spend thousands of pounds on merely talking to an attractive woman, than perhaps visiting Plentyoffish.com to find someone normal, who might EVEN want to appreciate him for the person he is, and not his wallet.

In a way, this occupation and way of life these women lead both contradicts and supports ideas of feminism, which I suppose is the bit that baffles me the most, because:

A) These women are being empowered by having such mental control over these men (and really benefiting financially/ materialistically)

BUT

B) These women are being lowered in standards by having to use a man to earn their way in life and make money.

Its tricky. I get to a point where I almost feel sorry for these men, but then I do think, they can’t be that stupid and naive. They know what’s going on. And it also makes me wonder furthermore about the men themselves… surely if they pay thousands to simply have a conversation with a woman whom they might never have even met in person, they must be paying equal, if not larger sums, to sleep with another. Right? Unless of course, they are actually married, or very, very old.

All of this, is my catch 22. My opinion-forming predicament.

What I really didn’t like though for sure, are some of things the girls said. Danica for example, mentioning something along the lines of how she felt exploited, when essentially she’s doing the same thing to men, or Holly Henderson claiming “My family grew up with nothing and I’m just trying to make something of myself. I’m no scrounger.” Well, hate to break that part to you love, but you are pretty much taking things from someone without paying for them in money, that is kind of on some level either scrounging or theft. Or manipulation. Which ever. Plus, I know one of them is doing a degree, but big deal, I’m doing a degree, along with millions of others in the UK, and we don’t all feel the need to use it as an excuse to justify other parts of our lives.

Saying all of this, I really think the hatred which has been pushed the rinsers’ way by the public is far too extreme. I just hope that one day, they will give up their rinser lifestyles, and make their own money- completely- not through a “personal website” where some pervy old fart will give up £50 to watch you horse ride- I’m talking helping others, being inventive, creating a product or a service or doing something that requires you to think a bit harder than what it is you’re going to tweet next, or which part of your body you’re going to photograph. 

If not, no matter how hard these women try, they’ll never have that pleasure of owning or buying something that they’ve earn by themselves. And what will happen when these men get bored, die or get married. What happens when they don’t look so pretty? Will they still want to be doing this when they’re 50?

So many questions.

In the mean time though, I’m sure they will go on to milk this new found fame for every drop. And no matter how hard I try, I will no doubt be watching the reality TV show when it’s out. Will you be watching?

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Elsa Peretti’s calling it a day at Tiffany’s

Once again university work has led me down a road of abandonment to my poor little blog, but the hand-in has now passed, summer has truly arrived and as I sit in my tiny box of a room, living the last month in halls really quite to its fullest (aka alone, sweltering and literally just wearing pants and a t shirt), I am now making an oath to myself to write more. No matter who or who does not read the posts.

I thought I’d return with a small ponder over Elsa Peretti deciding (quite deservingly), to part ways with the iconic jewellery brand, Tiffany & Co, after at least three decades of hardcore design service. And it seems, really rather dramatically, that some people are freaking out. Why? I mean, it’s obvious that the brand may lose a few sales from it, but why is this Forbes article I just read insinuating it could be a more drastic be all and end all case?

I’m not toooo fussed about the business hooo-hah side of this, but in basics, Tiffany’s want to buy the Peretti Intellectual Property, so it can remain exclusive to them. But if Elsa isn’t too pleased about this, she can terminate the agreement, and Tiffany & Co will be allowed to manufacture Peretti’s designs for 6 more months, after which they must sell as much stock as they can for a year.

Personally, I think Tiffany & Co should just bite the bullet and move on. Fair play, Elsa Peretti has created some of the brand’s most popular and profit-generating pieces, notably the open heart, which by the way, I did want and asked for for my birthday (about 11 years ago… when I was 10.) But this only adds to the point I am trying to get to; the open heart, the whole minimalist ting, it’s kind of been around the block a billion times since it was in its hey-day, hasn’t it? And now, it seems like many a jewellery brand are doing similar things. Its become slightly… ubiquitous.

As amazing as Elsa has been, all brands- be they based on one designer or many- must eventually have to move on. It is the way of life. Tiffany & Co is more than just the open heart or oval disc designs. It is the blue box. It is wedding rings. It is the more recent key designs. Its power and popularity is marked in music and film. It is iconic not just for this one designer, but for being the brand that it is. Sure, it may lose some equity, but what’s to stop it gaining more?

Quite simply*, it might be time to take on a new designer, and there are plenty (and talented at that) out there, and maybe then market the shit out if it. Come on Tiffany’s, we believe in you.

*Well.. I know it’s not all THAT simple

And in honour of Elsa:

Image

Image

Images:

Anaheimhillsjewelry.com

Tiffanyelsaperettijewelry.com

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Writer’s Block: Gia Coppola directs for DVF and Current/Elliott

I love this promotional video for the new collaboration between Diane Von Furstenburg and Current/Elliott. I love it so much that I had to share it:

Through cutting parodical clips of old Hollywood classics including The Shining and Platoon (I think?) with a Martin Scorsese- inspired voiceover narrated story, Gia Coppola has constructed a dream-like, almost modern day fairytale with hints of movie and style nostalgia. The simple yet symmetrical cinematography, ambient soft lighting and the comically effective editing combine to project a quality of film similar to the classics she mimics and is evidently inspired by. Even the music reminds me of Scorsese, with the final tune sounding a LOT like the instrumental version of Lola used in Goodfellas.

What I most love about this film however, is that despite all of the obvious skill and classic cinematic aesthetic, this fashion film does not come across as pretentious, which I find many nowadays do. There aren’t really any fancy graphics or wannabe indie attributes. There is however humour and a genuine appreciation for not only fashion, but film itself, as well as a clever representation of 70′s era Diane Von Furstenburg blending with contemporary brand, Current/Elliott.

Which brings me to my final point: isn’t the collection just FABULOUS? Literally, love the outfit in which our star hatches her idea: that gorgeous embellished top with the light blue printed jeans. I’m sure it works much more on blondes but I am still tempted myself.

Also, the way Leonard talks really reminds me of (albeit a hotter version) Jedward. Agree?

 

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Will you be tweeting in the dark?

Just when I thought I’d seen pretty much everything when it comes to social media taking over (and slightly ruining) our lives, something just a little bit more insane pops up out of the blue and into my inbox: Tweeting In The Dark.

What, may you ask, is this curiously intriguing metaphor?

Well, in other words, now you can improve your chances of getting laid, through your followers.

Officially launching tomorrow, Tweeting in the Dark is a new on line hook-up venture created by uber-cool underwear brand, Bjorn Borg.

The brand conducted a survey all about Twitter and sex and realised that apparently 53% of users flirt on Twitter, and 42% claim to be sexually adventurous (not quite sure if this means on Twitter or in general, but any way…) After coming to the conclusion that (surprise!) people really like sex, they created a website in which Tweeters can type the Twitter name of the person they like, and that person gets notified (with a certain touch of class) that “someone wants to do you in the dark.”

Only thing is, the receiver has to enter the name of the sender into their box, before they find out who sent it. With me? No? That’s ok, to be honest, it’s a little pathetic, and I’m sure you have other means of finding romance.

Don’t get me wrong, I love Bjorn Borg, and their campaigns are usually super sweet. But this, I just can’t really get my head around. Like, yeahhhhh, it might be a nice little 5 minutes of light-hearted excitement for someone having a quiet day at work, not to mention an instant ego-boost. But will relationships realistically blossom?

Call me pessimistic here if you will, but take into account:

1. Location: Think of the sexual frustration that may occur when @CharlieBrown realises that @LanaLou lives on the other side of the planet in Australia.

2. Looks: It’s kind of like a blind date really, because a photograph on your profile can be oh-so-deceiving. Cue disappointment.

3. Now I admit this one is, I suppose slightly melodramatic, but you just can’t tell who a person exactly is these days. They could be anyone behind their twitter alias. This could be dangerous.

And lastly…

4. It’s on Twitter! One of the most public places to express yourself, to anyone on Twitter, anywhere in the world. Do people really flirt that openly? I have’t actually seen much of it, but I’d much rather go on a date or maybe even chat to someone on the phone, privately, than type out flirtatious innuendos and comments over my feed. 

At the end of the day, you never know who’s watching, even if it is supposedly “in the dark”.

Some of the responses were videoed and this one is my fave, with priceless answers including “Spanking”, “luminous underwear” and “ping pong”. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rn5SID2uch4&feature=player_embedded

 

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Stylist Pick: Taking the fun out of fashion?

I have to admit, at first, I thought this was a relatively good idea: a website, “hand picking” a selection of items “personally” for you, determined by your tastes and celebrity preferences. I was tempted. I was reeled in.

I saw the facebook suggestion, I clicked, I took a 5 question quiz to figure out what type of style I have, and boom, there were my choices of shoes and bags. In a hazy 5 minutes of interactive on line activity, I felt I was in some kind of shoe shopping heaven. But realistically, I probably only actually liked a couple of the accessories this stylist robot chose, and even more realistically, would I be willing to part with £39.95 of my hard-earnt ciznash, for a pair of Brogues I could pick up in Primark for at least half the price? 

I’ve only decided to bring this up now as I’ve noticed a few too many emails drifting my way recently. The last one, yesterday; apparently my April showroom is ready, and I can also receive 25% off! The previous: Cheryl Cole’s shoes are 40% off! Before that: if I hurry, I can shop any item for just £15 until midnight!

The discounts and special prices go on and on. In other words, Stylist Pick cannot be doing so well right now and honestly, it does not surprise me.

I mean, on first look, it did everything in its power to bring you this incredible experience: you’re assigned your “very own” stylist. Your picks are a result of answers you have provided. There are videos of your stylist showing you around Stylist Pick HQ, talking directly to the camera.

Take one tiny deep thought though, and this can easily be reverted: you’re assigned one stylist from a group of four. Your picks are a result of answers you have provided, from multiple choice questions of a group of 3 (I distinctly remember having to pick my “favourite celebrity style” from Alexa Chung, Rihanna and Cheryl Cole? To be honest, they’re all all right, but there are so many more…) It’s basically just picking the best of the bunch, be it really you or not.

Looking at my April picks, my summer shoes are all- bar one pair of not-nice woven sandals- wedges, and mostly sky high. Being nearly 5″9, I don’t really wear a lot of heels, especially for Summer, in the day. If gorgeous and special enough, I’ll buy heels, no matter the price, after a lot of browsing and thought. But even that’s rare, and Stylist has picked a few pairs which are neither really that gorgeous or special. I then have 3 bags to choose from. I actually do like one satchel style, but I don’t want it in nude/ peach. In fact, I was actually considering yellow this season. And that pretty much summarises my showroom this month. Am I tempted? Not at all.

Which brings me back to my initial point. Maybe, for some, who don’t really like to spend precious time shopping and don’t really know what they like, this is okay. But I think Stylist Pick needs to do a bit more to make it relevant, personal and most importantly accurate. It’s a hard task, because everyone has their own little preferences and tastes which Stylist Pick will probably never know. At the moment, I’d still much rather spend a little longer browsing ASOS or Topshop online to find something I know I like.

Does it really make you feel unique, picking from 18 boxes, that you know thousands of others are too?

 

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

The patronising mythical elixir of eternal youth

A couple of days ago images of a suspiciously young and almost alien-looking Demi Moore were released, promoting skin care brand, Helena Rubinstein. The photographs of the 49 year old (who although no doubt looks good for her age) were so heavily re-touched you could barely even recognise the woman as her.

We have all become aware and sadly accustomed to celebrities being re-touched and “enhanced” for magazine photo shoots, and brands are now being pinpointed if their ambassadors look too overdone. But what amazes me, is that these skin care brands still think it’s an effective way to sell their product.

Image

Firstly, I ask myself, would my mum be at all tempted to buy into the oh-so-obvious lie being conveyed through this image? Definitely not. Why? Because she is not blind, and she is also not a moron.

I personally find it shocking that brands such as this are still targeting a 35+ market who have grown to become incredibly cynical of any advertising whatsoever, let alone cosmetic products, in what is essentially an offensive and patronising way. The first thing a woman thinks when she looks at an advert like this isn’t, “oh wow, I could really look like that if I buy the product”. She knows it’s been photo-shopped, and she knows what the real Demi Moore looks like, albeit maybe with make up and a gown on the red carpet, but still without an adobe re-touch. 

Additionally, surely the brand must know that as soon as the images are released, press and bloggers are going to trample all over them? Is it some sort of backwards publicity stunt?

Image

The photos were ironically released just days before Cate Blanchett emerged on the cover of Intelligent Life magazine, completely free from the wrath of Photoshop and looking stunning for her 42 years. Hopefully this provides not only a complete smack in the face for Helena Rubenstein, but also a well-learnt lesson. Maybe if she’d put Cate on the campaign- someone who women of her age can relate to and appreciate- she’d earn a bit more profit. In the mean time, I hope she places a tenner or two in the douche-bag jar.*

 

*If you’re unsure of what this is in reference to please start watching New Girl.

 

 

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Thank you Kate Moss.

After some slight worries that the only Kate I’d be seeing in the news ever again would be the Duchess of Cambridge, my favourite super makes a come back in full force. Hot off the back of her campaign for Mango and catwalking at Louis Vuitton’s S/S 12 show, Kate Moss has made an epic return to the press and blog world with an array of projects.

Not only is she going to be in the sport relief special of Ab Fab (which, by the way, looks hilarious), but Miss Moss will also be gracing our magazine pages as the face of Vogue Eyewear, and in a beautifully luxurious editorial for American Vogue, shot by the notable Tim Walker and styled by the legend, Grace Coddington.

Image

Today the hot story circulating is her “reminiscing of her relationship with Johnny Depp”. Could this delve back into work be an attempt to remember what life was once like, before she finally tied the knot with Jamie? 

Whatever the reason, I really don’t care. I’m just glad she’s back in our lives. A true Brit diamond, showing the youngsters how the model game’s really played. Kate Middle-whooo?

Preview of Kate Moss in Ab Fab

 

 

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized